AHK-CuvsCrystagen
Side-by-side comparison across mechanism, dosage, evidence, side effects, administration, and stack synergies. Citations on every claim where available.
01Mechanism of Action
02Dosage Protocols
04Side Effects & Safety
- ·Known copper allergy or Wilson's disease
- ·Active autoimmune disease (theoretical)
- ·Broken or inflamed skin (increased absorption risk)
- ·Concurrent use of other copper-containing formulations
- ·Pregnancy / lactation (no data)
- ·Active B-cell malignancies
05Administration Protocol
06Stack Synergy
Both tripeptide-copper complexes share overlapping angiogenic and wound-healing mechanisms (VEGF elevation, TGF-β modulation, fibroblast proliferation). AHK-Cu's alanine substitution may offer distinct receptor affinity or pharmacokinetics. Co-formulation could provide complementary dermal signaling, though no direct synergy studies exist. Often used interchangeably or in alternating protocols.
- AHK-Cu
- 0.001–0.01% topical · AM
- GHK-Cu
- 0.001–0.01% topical · PM
- Frequency
- Daily alternation or combined formulation
- Primary benefit
- Comprehensive dermal regeneration, angiogenesis, hair follicle support
Vilon (Lys-Glu) activates T-helper cells via apoptosis reduction, while Crystagen activates B-cells. Dual T/B immune modulation in aging models may provide complementary thymic-immune support within the Khavinson bioregulator framework. Both target splenic immune aging through distinct lymphocyte subsets.
- Crystagen
- Dose unknown · SQ
- Vilon
- Dose unknown · SQ
- Frequency
- Protocol variable
- Primary benefit
- Broader thymic-immune coverage (T-cell + B-cell)