AOD-9604vsCJC-1295 (no DAC)
Side-by-side comparison across mechanism, dosage, evidence, side effects, administration, and stack synergies. Citations on every claim where available.
01Mechanism of Action
02Dosage Protocols
04Side Effects & Safety
- ·Pregnancy / breastfeeding
- ·Severe cardiovascular disease (caution with β-receptor agonists)
- ·Active malignancy or cancer history
- ·Pregnancy / breastfeeding
- ·Disrupted hypothalamic-pituitary axis
- ·Concurrent β-blocker therapy (theoretical antagonism)
- ·Pheochromocytoma
- ·Untreated diabetes
- ·Severe insulin resistance
05Administration Protocol
06Stack Synergy
AOD-9604 mobilises FFAs from adipose via β3-AR; MOTS-c upregulates AMPK / PGC-1α / FAO machinery so that mobilised FFAs are efficiently oxidised. The pathways are sequential — supply (AOD) plus demand (MOTS-c) — and produce more durable lipolytic effects than either alone in anecdotal protocols.
- AOD-9604
- 250–300 mcg SQ · morning fasted (daily)
- MOTS-c
- 5 mg SQ · 2–3× per week (pre-workout)
- Primary benefit
- Fat mobilisation + mitochondrial oxidation, no IGF-1 concern
CJC-1295 (no DAC) and ipamorelin are the canonical "GHRH + GHRP" dual-axis stack at physiological timing. Both peak within 30 min and clear within 2 hours, producing a sharp, high-amplitude GH pulse closely resembling natural physiology. Preferred over the CJC-1295-DAC + ipamorelin stack when pulsatility (vs sustained elevation) is the goal.
- CJC-1295 (no DAC)
- 100 mcg SQ · pre-sleep
- Ipamorelin
- 200–300 mcg SQ · same injection
- Primary benefit
- Pulsatile GH stimulation, recovery, body composition