AOD-9604vsCrystagen
Side-by-side comparison across mechanism, dosage, evidence, side effects, administration, and stack synergies. Citations on every claim where available.
01Mechanism of Action
02Dosage Protocols
04Side Effects & Safety
- ·Pregnancy / breastfeeding
- ·Severe cardiovascular disease (caution with β-receptor agonists)
- ·Active autoimmune disease (theoretical)
- ·Concurrent β-blocker therapy (theoretical antagonism)
- ·Pheochromocytoma
- ·Pregnancy / lactation (no data)
- ·Active B-cell malignancies
05Administration Protocol
06Stack Synergy
AOD-9604 mobilises FFAs from adipose via β3-AR; MOTS-c upregulates AMPK / PGC-1α / FAO machinery so that mobilised FFAs are efficiently oxidised. The pathways are sequential — supply (AOD) plus demand (MOTS-c) — and produce more durable lipolytic effects than either alone in anecdotal protocols.
- AOD-9604
- 250–300 mcg SQ · morning fasted (daily)
- MOTS-c
- 5 mg SQ · 2–3× per week (pre-workout)
- Primary benefit
- Fat mobilisation + mitochondrial oxidation, no IGF-1 concern
Vilon (Lys-Glu) activates T-helper cells via apoptosis reduction, while Crystagen activates B-cells. Dual T/B immune modulation in aging models may provide complementary thymic-immune support within the Khavinson bioregulator framework. Both target splenic immune aging through distinct lymphocyte subsets.
- Crystagen
- Dose unknown · SQ
- Vilon
- Dose unknown · SQ
- Frequency
- Protocol variable
- Primary benefit
- Broader thymic-immune coverage (T-cell + B-cell)