AOD-9604vsTB-500
Side-by-side comparison across mechanism, dosage, evidence, side effects, administration, and stack synergies. Citations on every claim where available.
01Mechanism of Action
02Dosage Protocols
04Side Effects & Safety
- ·Pregnancy / breastfeeding
- ·Severe cardiovascular disease (caution with β-receptor agonists)
- ·Active malignancy (theoretical angiogenesis concern)
- ·Pregnancy / breastfeeding
- ·Concurrent β-blocker therapy (theoretical antagonism)
- ·Pheochromocytoma
- ·Cancer history
- ·Concurrent VEGF inhibitor therapy
05Administration Protocol
06Stack Synergy
AOD-9604 mobilises FFAs from adipose via β3-AR; MOTS-c upregulates AMPK / PGC-1α / FAO machinery so that mobilised FFAs are efficiently oxidised. The pathways are sequential — supply (AOD) plus demand (MOTS-c) — and produce more durable lipolytic effects than either alone in anecdotal protocols.
- AOD-9604
- 250–300 mcg SQ · morning fasted (daily)
- MOTS-c
- 5 mg SQ · 2–3× per week (pre-workout)
- Primary benefit
- Fat mobilisation + mitochondrial oxidation, no IGF-1 concern
TB-500 and BPC-157 cover complementary halves of tissue repair: BPC-157 upregulates VEGFR2-driven angiogenesis and fibroblast outgrowth; TB-500 sequesters G-actin to enable endothelial / epithelial migration. The anecdotal canonical "healing stack" — pairs especially well for tendon and ligament injuries.
- TB-500
- 2 mg SQ · 2× per week
- BPC-157
- 250–500 mcg SQ · daily
- Primary benefit
- Combined angiogenesis + cell migration for tendon/ligament/muscle repair