AOD-9604vsTesamorelin
Side-by-side comparison across mechanism, dosage, evidence, side effects, administration, and stack synergies. Citations on every claim where available.
01Mechanism of Action
02Dosage Protocols
03Metabolic / Fat Loss Evidence
04Side Effects & Safety
- ·Pregnancy / breastfeeding
- ·Severe cardiovascular disease (caution with β-receptor agonists)
- ·Active malignancy or history of treated cancer
- ·Pregnancy
- ·Hypersensitivity to tesamorelin or mannitol
- ·Disruption of hypothalamic-pituitary axis (trauma, tumour, radiation)
- ·Concurrent β-blocker therapy (theoretical antagonism)
- ·Pheochromocytoma
- ·Untreated diabetes (monitor HbA1c)
- ·Severe carpal tunnel syndrome
- ·Acute critical illness
05Administration Protocol
06Stack Synergy
AOD-9604 mobilises FFAs from adipose via β3-AR; MOTS-c upregulates AMPK / PGC-1α / FAO machinery so that mobilised FFAs are efficiently oxidised. The pathways are sequential — supply (AOD) plus demand (MOTS-c) — and produce more durable lipolytic effects than either alone in anecdotal protocols.
- AOD-9604
- 250–300 mcg SQ · morning fasted (daily)
- MOTS-c
- 5 mg SQ · 2–3× per week (pre-workout)
- Primary benefit
- Fat mobilisation + mitochondrial oxidation, no IGF-1 concern
Tesamorelin (GHRH analogue) and ipamorelin (GHRP / ghrelin mimetic) act on two distinct receptor systems to amplify GH release synergistically — GHRH receptor + ghrelin receptor. This dual-axis stimulation produces a more robust, sustained GH pulse than either alone while maintaining physiological pulsatility. Ipamorelin is highly selective with minimal cortisol or prolactin elevation, making it the preferred GHRP pairing.
- Tesamorelin
- 2 mg SQ · evening
- Ipamorelin
- 200–300 mcg SQ · same injection
- Frequency
- Once daily, pre-sleep
- Primary benefit
- Maximal GH pulsatility, fat loss, recovery, sleep quality