ARA 290vsSS-31
Side-by-side comparison across mechanism, dosage, evidence, side effects, administration, and stack synergies. Citations on every claim where available.
01Mechanism of Action
02Dosage Protocols
03Metabolic / Fat Loss Evidence
04Side Effects & Safety
- ·Hypersensitivity to ARA 290
- ·Pregnancy / breastfeeding
- ·Hypersensitivity to peptide
- ·Active malignancy (theoretical EPO-axis concern; not observed in trials)
- ·None established
05Administration Protocol
06Stack Synergy
ARA 290 targets the innate repair receptor (EPO/CD131) for nerve regeneration and anti-inflammatory signaling, while BPC-157 promotes angiogenesis and tissue repair through distinct mechanisms (likely involving VEGF, growth hormone receptor pathways). Combined, they may address both neuroinflammation and structural tissue repair in neuropathy or injury models. No direct clinical data; mechanistic overlap in tissue protection.
- ARA 290
- 4 mg SQ · daily
- BPC-157
- 250–500 mcg SQ · daily
- Frequency
- Once daily, same or separate injections
- Primary benefit
- Nerve regeneration, pain reduction, tissue healing
SS-31 and MOTS-c address mitochondrial decline through complementary axes. SS-31 protects existing mitochondrial structure (cardiolipin binding, cristae stabilisation). MOTS-c upregulates AMPK/PGC-1α, triggering biogenesis of new mitochondria. Together they pair preservation with renewal — anecdotally favoured in healthspan and post-cardio-event recovery protocols.
- SS-31
- 5–10 mg SQ · daily morning
- MOTS-c
- 5 mg SQ · 2× per week pre-workout
- Primary benefit
- Mitochondrial preservation + biogenesis