CJC-1295 (no DAC)vsGHK-Cu
Side-by-side comparison across mechanism, dosage, evidence, side effects, administration, and stack synergies. Citations on every claim where available.
01Mechanism of Action
02Dosage Protocols
04Side Effects & Safety
- ·Active malignancy or cancer history
- ·Pregnancy / breastfeeding
- ·Disrupted hypothalamic-pituitary axis
- ·Wilson disease (copper-overload disorder)
- ·Pregnancy / breastfeeding
- ·Known copper hypersensitivity
- ·Untreated diabetes
- ·Severe insulin resistance
- ·Hemochromatosis (copper-iron crosstalk theoretical)
- ·Concurrent copper-chelator therapy
05Administration Protocol
06Stack Synergy
CJC-1295 (no DAC) and ipamorelin are the canonical "GHRH + GHRP" dual-axis stack at physiological timing. Both peak within 30 min and clear within 2 hours, producing a sharp, high-amplitude GH pulse closely resembling natural physiology. Preferred over the CJC-1295-DAC + ipamorelin stack when pulsatility (vs sustained elevation) is the goal.
- CJC-1295 (no DAC)
- 100 mcg SQ · pre-sleep
- Ipamorelin
- 200–300 mcg SQ · same injection
- Primary benefit
- Pulsatile GH stimulation, recovery, body composition
GHK-Cu drives ECM remodelling and copper-dependent enzymes; BPC-157 upregulates VEGFR2 angiogenesis and fibroblast migration. The pathways are non-overlapping and complementary — together they accelerate wound healing more than either alone in anecdotal protocols.
- GHK-Cu
- 1–2 mg SQ · daily near wound
- BPC-157
- 250–500 mcg SQ · daily near wound
- Primary benefit
- Combined ECM rebuilding + angiogenesis for tissue repair