Side-by-side · Research reference

CJC-1295 (no DAC)vsMGF

Side-by-side comparison across mechanism, dosage, evidence, side effects, administration, and stack synergies. Citations on every claim where available.

APhase 1HUMAN-REVIEWED15/51 cited

BAnimal-StrongHUMAN-REVIEWED14/55 cited

CJC-1295 (no DAC)

Short-acting GHRH · No DAC variant

100 mcgPer doseTeichman 2006

~30 minHalf-lifeIonescu 2006

Phase 1Evidence levelTeichman 2006 Sigalos 2018

SQ · Pre-sleep · 1–2×/day

MGF

IGF-1Ec Splice Variant · Muscle-Specific

IGF-1EcSplice variantArmakolas 2016

24-AASynthetic E-domain

Animal onlyHuman evidence

SQ · Research context only

01Mechanism of Action

Parameter

CJC-1295 (no DAC)

MGF

Primary target

Pituitary GHRH receptorTeichman 2006

Satellite cells (Pax7+) in skeletal muscleMoore 2018

Pathway

GHRH-R → Gαs → cAMP → PKA → GH vesicle exocytosisTeichman 2006

Mechanical stress → IGF-1Ec mRNA upregulation → Local E-domain peptide release → Satellite cell activation

Downstream effect

Pulsatile GH release matching physiological pattern; subsequent IGF-1 elevationIonescu 2006

Satellite cell proliferation, myoblast differentiation, muscle fiber repair

Feedback intact?

Yes — short pulse preserves somatostatin negative feedbackIonescu 2006

—

Origin

Modified human GRF 1-29 with four substitutions (D-Ala²/Gln⁸/Ala¹⁵/Leu²⁷) for protease resistanceTeichman 2006

Alternative splicing of IGF-1 gene (exons 4-6) produces IGF-1Ec precursor; E-domain cleaved post-translationallyArmakolas 2016 Vassilakos 2017

Antibody development

Not reported in short-term studies

—

02Dosage Protocols

Parameter

CJC-1295 (no DAC)

MGF

Standard dose

100 mcg per injectionTeichman 2006

Often paired with ipamorelin in same syringe.

—

Frequency

1–2× daily (pre-sleep ± morning)

—

Lower / starter dose

50 mcg per dose

—

Evidence basis

Phase 1 (CJC-1295 with DAC); analog dataTeichman 2006 Ionescu 2006

No-DAC variant is less studied directly; PK extrapolated from native GHRH.

Animal models + in vitro only

Duration

8–12 weeks on / 4 off (anecdotal)

—

Reconstitution

Bacteriostatic water

—

Timing

Pre-sleep + fasted preferred

—

Half-life

~30 minIonescu 2006

Short pulse vs CJC-1295-DAC (~8 days). Choose no-DAC for pulsatile, DAC for sustained.

—

Synthetic peptide

—

24-amino-acid E-domain sequence

Corresponds to human IGF-1Ec exons 4-6 region.

Rodent cardiac model

—

200 μg/kg via peptide-eluting microstructures

Post-MI injection; improved ejection fraction by 8 weeks.

Acute delivery (mouse MI)

—

Single bolus within 12 hrs post-infarctionShioura 2014

Delayed decompensation; no human protocol established.

Human evidence

—

None — no published clinical trials

All dosing extrapolated from animal models.

Detection in doping

—

Full-length MGF detected via LC-MS in illicit productsThevis 2014

WADA-prohibited since 2005; no therapeutic indication.

04Side Effects & Safety

Parameter

CJC-1295 (no DAC)

MGF

Injection site reaction

Erythema, mild pruritus

—

Flushing / headache

Common transient effect

—

Cortisol elevation

Minimal at standard doses

—

Prolactin elevation

Minimal

—

Glucose intolerance

Possible at high cumulative doses

—

IGF-1 elevation

Dose-dependent; monitor with chronic use

—

Cancer risk

Contraindicated in active malignancy (GH/IGF-1 axis)

—

Pregnancy / OB

Avoid

—

Human safety data

—

None — no clinical trials published

Theoretical IGF-1 axis risk

—

Chronic IGF-1Ec overexpression linked to cancer progression (prostate, colorectal, breast)

Tumor promotion

—

IGF-1Ec overexpressed in osteosarcoma, colorectal polyps with dysplasia, endometrial cancer

Antibody development

—

Unknown — no longitudinal human exposure data

Local injection reaction

—

Presumed similar to other peptides (erythema, induration) — no direct evidence

Dysregulated expression with age

—

Older adults (70+ yrs) show blunted IGF-1Ec response post-exercise vs youngMoore 2018

Absolute Contraindications

CJC-1295 (no DAC)

·Active malignancy or cancer history
·Pregnancy / breastfeeding
·Disrupted hypothalamic-pituitary axis

MGF

·Active malignancy or history of IGF-1-sensitive cancers (prostate, colorectal, breast, osteosarcoma)
·No established therapeutic use — investigational only

Relative Contraindications

CJC-1295 (no DAC)

·Untreated diabetes
·Severe insulin resistance

MGF

·Family history of IGF-1-axis malignancies
·Use outside research setting

05Administration Protocol

Parameter

CJC-1295 (no DAC)

MGF

1. Reconstitution

Add 2 mL bacteriostatic water to 2 mg vial → 1 mg/mL = 100 mcg per 0.1 mL. Roll gently.

MGF (E-domain peptide) has no approved clinical protocol. All published data derive from animal models or in vitro experiments.

2. Injection site

Subcutaneous, abdomen or thigh. Rotate sites.

Commercially available MGF corresponds to the 24-amino-acid human E-domain (hEc). Rodent E-domain (Eb) is structurally distinct and not interchangeable.

3. Timing

Pre-sleep preferred. Often combined with ipamorelin in the same syringe.

Rodent studies used peptide-eluting polymeric microstructures (cardiac) or direct intramuscular injection. Routes and doses non-translatable to humans.Peña 2015 Shioura 2014

4. Storage

Lyophilised: room temp, protected from light. Reconstituted: refrigerate 2–8 °C, use within 30 days.

MGF peptides prohibited in sport since 2005. Detection via LC-MS established for full-length MGF products.Thevis 2014

5. Needle

29–31G, 4–8 mm insulin syringe.

Any human use falls outside approved medical practice and regulatory frameworks. No safety or efficacy data exist.

06Stack Synergy

CJC-1295 (no DAC)

+ Ipamorelin

Strong

View Ipamorelin →

CJC-1295 (no DAC) and ipamorelin are the canonical "GHRH + GHRP" dual-axis stack at physiological timing. Both peak within 30 min and clear within 2 hours, producing a sharp, high-amplitude GH pulse closely resembling natural physiology. Preferred over the CJC-1295-DAC + ipamorelin stack when pulsatility (vs sustained elevation) is the goal.

CJC-1295 (no DAC): 100 mcg SQ · pre-sleep
Ipamorelin: 200–300 mcg SQ · same injection
Primary benefit: Pulsatile GH stimulation, recovery, body composition

Teichman 2006 Raun 1998

MGF

+ BPC-157

Multi-pathway

View BPC-157 →

MGF activates satellite cells for muscle fiber repair; BPC-157 promotes angiogenesis, collagen synthesis, and tendon healing via distinct pathways (VEGF, FAK, integrin signaling). Theoretical synergy in post-injury contexts combines myogenic (MGF) and stromal (BPC-157) repair mechanisms. Both lack human validation.

MGF: No established dose
BPC-157: 250–500 mcg SQ near injury site
Context: Animal models only
Primary benefit: Theoretical multi-tissue repair (muscle + tendon/ligament)

+ TB-500

Moderate

View TB-500 →

TB-500 (thymosin beta-4 fragment) enhances actin polymerization, cell migration, and angiogenesis—complementary to MGF satellite cell activation. Both upregulated post-injury; combined use presumed additive for muscle regeneration in preclinical models.

MGF: No established dose
TB-500: 2–5 mg SQ weekly
Context: Animal models only
Primary benefit: Satellite cell activation + enhanced migration/angiogenesis