CJC-1295 (no DAC)vsMOTS-c
Side-by-side comparison across mechanism, dosage, evidence, side effects, administration, and stack synergies. Citations on every claim where available.
01Mechanism of Action
02Dosage Protocols
03Metabolic / Fat Loss Evidence
04Side Effects & Safety
- ·Active malignancy or cancer history
- ·Pregnancy / breastfeeding
- ·Disrupted hypothalamic-pituitary axis
- ·Pregnancy / breastfeeding (insufficient data)
- ·Untreated diabetes
- ·Severe insulin resistance
- ·Active cancer or cancer predisposition
- ·AMPK pathway deficiency (efficacy nullified)
- ·Use with cancer-promoting medications (theoretical)
05Administration Protocol
06Stack Synergy
CJC-1295 (no DAC) and ipamorelin are the canonical "GHRH + GHRP" dual-axis stack at physiological timing. Both peak within 30 min and clear within 2 hours, producing a sharp, high-amplitude GH pulse closely resembling natural physiology. Preferred over the CJC-1295-DAC + ipamorelin stack when pulsatility (vs sustained elevation) is the goal.
- CJC-1295 (no DAC)
- 100 mcg SQ · pre-sleep
- Ipamorelin
- 200–300 mcg SQ · same injection
- Primary benefit
- Pulsatile GH stimulation, recovery, body composition
MOTS-c activates AMPK/PGC-1α for mitochondrial efficiency and fatty acid oxidation; ipamorelin stimulates GH for anabolic recovery and sleep depth. Pathways are complementary — MOTS-c handles metabolic flexibility and glucose handling while ipamorelin drives recovery and body recomposition through GH. Theoretical synergy is high; clinical data is lacking.
- MOTS-c
- 5 mg SQ · pre-workout (2–3×/wk)
- Ipamorelin
- 200–300 mcg SQ · pre-sleep (daily)
- Primary benefit
- Metabolic flexibility + GH recovery + ROS reduction