CrystagenvsHumanin
Side-by-side comparison across mechanism, dosage, evidence, side effects, administration, and stack synergies. Citations on every claim where available.
01Mechanism of Action
02Dosage Protocols
03Metabolic / Fat Loss Evidence
04Side Effects & Safety
- ·Active autoimmune disease (theoretical)
- ·Unknown — no human data
- ·Pregnancy / lactation (no data)
- ·Active B-cell malignancies
- ·Active malignancy (theoretical risk of anti-apoptotic effect on tumour cells)
05Administration Protocol
06Stack Synergy
Vilon (Lys-Glu) activates T-helper cells via apoptosis reduction, while Crystagen activates B-cells. Dual T/B immune modulation in aging models may provide complementary thymic-immune support within the Khavinson bioregulator framework. Both target splenic immune aging through distinct lymphocyte subsets.
- Crystagen
- Dose unknown · SQ
- Vilon
- Dose unknown · SQ
- Frequency
- Protocol variable
- Primary benefit
- Broader thymic-immune coverage (T-cell + B-cell)
Both are mitochondrial-derived peptides. MOTS-c enhances metabolic efficiency and insulin sensitivity via AMPK activation, while humanin prevents mitochondrial apoptosis. Combined, they address mitochondrial function (MOTS-c) and survival signaling (humanin), supporting cellular resilience under metabolic and oxidative stress.
- Humanin
- 4 mg/kg IP · daily (animal model)
- MOTS-c
- 5 mg/kg IP · daily (animal model)
- Frequency
- Once daily
- Primary benefit
- Mitochondrial health, metabolic efficiency, anti-apoptotic signaling