CrystagenvsSS-31
Side-by-side comparison across mechanism, dosage, evidence, side effects, administration, and stack synergies. Citations on every claim where available.
01Mechanism of Action
02Dosage Protocols
04Side Effects & Safety
- ·Active autoimmune disease (theoretical)
- ·Pregnancy / breastfeeding
- ·Hypersensitivity to peptide
- ·Pregnancy / lactation (no data)
- ·Active B-cell malignancies
- ·None established
05Administration Protocol
06Stack Synergy
Vilon (Lys-Glu) activates T-helper cells via apoptosis reduction, while Crystagen activates B-cells. Dual T/B immune modulation in aging models may provide complementary thymic-immune support within the Khavinson bioregulator framework. Both target splenic immune aging through distinct lymphocyte subsets.
- Crystagen
- Dose unknown · SQ
- Vilon
- Dose unknown · SQ
- Frequency
- Protocol variable
- Primary benefit
- Broader thymic-immune coverage (T-cell + B-cell)
SS-31 and MOTS-c address mitochondrial decline through complementary axes. SS-31 protects existing mitochondrial structure (cardiolipin binding, cristae stabilisation). MOTS-c upregulates AMPK/PGC-1α, triggering biogenesis of new mitochondria. Together they pair preservation with renewal — anecdotally favoured in healthspan and post-cardio-event recovery protocols.
- SS-31
- 5–10 mg SQ · daily morning
- MOTS-c
- 5 mg SQ · 2× per week pre-workout
- Primary benefit
- Mitochondrial preservation + biogenesis