GHRP-2vsMOTS-c
Side-by-side comparison across mechanism, dosage, evidence, side effects, administration, and stack synergies. Citations on every claim where available.
01Mechanism of Action
02Dosage Protocols
03Metabolic / Fat Loss Evidence
04Side Effects & Safety
- ·Active malignancy
- ·Pregnancy / breastfeeding
- ·Pregnancy / breastfeeding (insufficient data)
- ·Untreated diabetes
- ·Active cancer or cancer predisposition
- ·AMPK pathway deficiency (efficacy nullified)
- ·Use with cancer-promoting medications (theoretical)
05Administration Protocol
06Stack Synergy
GHRP-2 + CJC-1295-no-DAC is a higher-amplitude alternative to the ipamorelin + CJC-1295 stack. GHRP-2 produces a stronger pulse but with cortisol + prolactin signal — choose when maximum GH amplitude is the goal and the side-effect tolerance is acceptable.
- GHRP-2
- 100–200 mcg SQ · pre-sleep
- CJC-1295 (no DAC)
- 100 mcg SQ · same injection
- Primary benefit
- High-amplitude GH pulse, body composition
MOTS-c activates AMPK/PGC-1α for mitochondrial efficiency and fatty acid oxidation; ipamorelin stimulates GH for anabolic recovery and sleep depth. Pathways are complementary — MOTS-c handles metabolic flexibility and glucose handling while ipamorelin drives recovery and body recomposition through GH. Theoretical synergy is high; clinical data is lacking.
- MOTS-c
- 5 mg SQ · pre-workout (2–3×/wk)
- Ipamorelin
- 200–300 mcg SQ · pre-sleep (daily)
- Primary benefit
- Metabolic flexibility + GH recovery + ROS reduction