Side-by-side · Research reference

IGF-1 LR3vsIpamorelin

Side-by-side comparison across mechanism, dosage, evidence, side effects, administration, and stack synergies. Citations on every claim where available.

AAnimal-StrongHUMAN-REVIEWED10/58 cited

BPhase 1HUMAN-REVIEWED21/57 cited

IGF-1 LR3

IGF-1 Analogue · Research

3–10×Potency vs IGF-I

Low IGFBPBinding affinity

ResearchStatus

Research only · SQ typical in animal models

Ipamorelin

Selective GHRP · Ghrelin Mimetic

200–300 mcgPer doseRaun 1998

Phase 1Evidence levelRaun 1998 Sigalos 2018

~2 hrHalf-lifeRaun 1998

SQ · Multiple sites · 1–3×/day

01Mechanism of Action

Parameter

IGF-1 LR3

Ipamorelin

Primary target

IGF-1 receptor (IGF-1R)McTavish 2009

Ghrelin receptor (GHS-R1a) on anterior pituitaryRaun 1998

Pathway

IGF-1R → IRS-1 → PI3K/Akt → Cell proliferation, protein synthesis, anti-apoptosisMuhlbradt 2009

GHS-R1a binding → Gαq/11 → ↑intracellular Ca²⁺ → GH vesicle exocytosisRaun 1998 Bowers 1991

Downstream effect

Enhanced cell proliferation, muscle anabolism, inhibition of apoptosis, increased telomerase activity

GH pulse amplification, IGF-1 elevation, recovery and lipolytic effectsBowers 2002

Feedback intact?

No — exogenous IGF analogue bypasses GH-mediated regulation

Yes — pulsatile pattern preserved; somatostatin feedback activeBowers 2002

Origin

Synthetic 83-AA analogue: 13-AA N-terminal extension + Arg substitution at position 3

Pentapeptide H-Aib-His-D-2-Nal-D-Phe-Lys-NH₂; rationally designed for ghrelin-receptor selectivityRaun 1998

Antibody development

—

Not reported in short-term studies

02Dosage Protocols

Parameter

IGF-1 LR3

Ipamorelin

Research dose (animal models)

Variable by protocol and species

In vivo murine atherosclerosis studies used sustained delivery.

—

In vitro typical concentration

10–1000 ng/mLThomas 2007

Dose-dependent effects on follicle growth and estradiol production.

—

Half-maximal stimulation

0.6 nM LR3 vs 1.5 nM native IGF-1Price 2004

2.5-fold greater potency in lung fibroblast proliferation.

—

Evidence basis

Animal / in vitro only

Phase 1 + clinical practiceRaun 1998 Sigalos 2018

Human use

Not FDA-approved; no published human trials

—

Standard dose

—

200–300 mcg per injectionRaun 1998

Anecdotal community range; clinical doses 1–3 mg IV in trials.

Frequency

—

1–3× per day

Once daily pre-sleep is most common; twice or thrice for advanced users.

Lower / starter dose

—

100 mcg per dose

Duration

—

8–12 weeks on / 4 weeks off (anecdotal)

GHS-R desensitisation reported with continuous dosing.

Reconstitution

—

Bacteriostatic water; typical 2 mL per 5 mg vial

Timing

—

Pre-sleep + fasted preferred; 30 min away from food

Half-life

—

~2 hoursRaun 1998

Longer than GHRP-6 (15 min); shorter than CJC-1295-DAC (~8 days).

03Metabolic / Fat Loss Evidence

Parameter

IGF-1 LR3

Ipamorelin

Mechanism

IGF-1R activation → lipolytic signaling; secondary to anabolic effects

—

Direct lipolytic evidence

Minimal — primarily anabolic/anti-apoptotic in literature

—

Atherosclerotic plaque effects

Reduced stenosis and core size in ApoE-KO micevon 2011

Plaque stabilization via vSMC phenotype modulation, not direct fat loss.

—

Human data

None published

—

04Side Effects & Safety

Parameter

IGF-1 LR3

Ipamorelin

Hypoglycemia risk

Theoretical — IGF-1 analogues can lower blood glucose

—

Excessive cell proliferation

Mitogenic signaling; theoretical tumor promotion risk

—

Telomerase activation

2–10-fold increase in prostate cancer cells (PC-3, DU-145, LAPC-4)Wetterau 2003

Critically involved in cancer cell immortalization.

—

Oocyte degeneration

Increased oocyte degeneration at high doses (≥1000 ng/mL) in bovine folliclesThomas 2007

—

Unregulated anabolism

Bypasses physiological GH/IGF-1 feedback; no pulsatility control

—

Unknown human safety profile

No published human trials; safety data absent

—

Cortisol elevation

—

Negligible vs other GHRPsRaun 1998

Prolactin elevation

—

NegligibleRaun 1998

Hunger

—

Mild appetite increase via ghrelin-receptor crosstalk

Injection site reaction

—

Mild irritation possible

GH excess (overdose)

—

Joint pain, edema, insulin resistance

IGF-1 elevation

—

Dose-dependent; monitor with chronic high-dose use

Cancer risk

—

Theoretical via GH/IGF-1 axis; contraindicated in active malignancy

Pregnancy / OB

—

Avoid

Absolute Contraindications

IGF-1 LR3

·Active malignancy or history of cancer
·Not approved for human use

Ipamorelin

·Active malignancy or cancer history
·Pregnancy / breastfeeding
·Disrupted hypothalamic-pituitary axis

Relative Contraindications

IGF-1 LR3

·Diabetes or glucose intolerance
·Family history of cancer

Ipamorelin

·Untreated diabetes
·Severe insulin resistance
·Concurrent corticosteroid use (theoretical desensitisation)

05Administration Protocol

Parameter

IGF-1 LR3

Ipamorelin

1. Research use only

IGF-1 LR3 is not FDA-approved for human use. All administration data derives from animal or in vitro studies.

Add 2 mL bacteriostatic water to 5 mg vial → 2.5 mg/mL. Roll gently. Solution should be clear.

2. Typical research route

Subcutaneous or intraperitoneal injection in animal models. In vitro: added directly to culture medium at concentrations of 10–1000 ng/mL.Thomas 2007

Subcutaneous, abdomen or thigh. Rotate sites. Pinch fat for shallow SQ delivery.

3. Reconstitution (research)

Lyophilised powder reconstituted in sterile water or buffered saline per manufacturer protocol. Store at 2–8 °C after reconstitution.

Pre-sleep optimal — aligns with natural GH pulse. Some protocols add a morning fasted dose.

4. Stability

Enhanced stability vs native IGF-1 due to reduced IGFBP binding; exact half-life in vivo not fully characterized in humans.

Lyophilised: room temp, protected from light. Reconstituted: refrigerate 2–8 °C, use within 30 days.

5. Needle

—

29–31G, 4–8 mm insulin syringe.

06Stack Synergy

IGF-1 LR3

+ GHRP-6

Multi-pathway

View GHRP-6 →

GHRP-6 stimulates endogenous GH release, which drives hepatic IGF-1 synthesis. IGF-1 LR3 provides exogenous, IGFBP-resistant IGF signaling. Combining upstream GH stimulation with downstream IGF receptor activation creates a dual-pathway anabolic effect. However, this bypasses natural feedback and carries compounded mitogenic risk.

GHRP-6: 100–200 mcg SQ · 2–3× daily
IGF-1 LR3: Research doses variable · post-workout typical in animal models
Note: Research context only — no human protocols exist
Primary benefit: Theoretical maximal anabolic signaling (GH + IGF axes)

+ Ipamorelin

Multi-pathway

View Ipamorelin →

Ipamorelin (selective GHRP) stimulates pulsatile GH release without cortisol/prolactin elevation. IGF-1 LR3 directly activates IGF-1R independent of GH. This stack targets both upstream (GH secretion) and downstream (IGF receptor) nodes but eliminates physiological feedback, raising safety concerns around unchecked proliferation.

Ipamorelin: 200–300 mcg SQ · evening
IGF-1 LR3: Research doses only · timing variable
Caution: No human data; animal/in vitro only
Primary benefit: Dual-axis anabolic signaling (theoretical)

Ipamorelin

+ Tesamorelin

Strong

View Tesamorelin →

Ipamorelin (GHRP) + tesamorelin (GHRH analogue) is the textbook dual-axis GH stack. They activate two distinct pituitary receptors — the ghrelin receptor and the GHRH receptor — producing a synergistic GH pulse larger than either alone. Ipamorelin's selectivity (no cortisol/prolactin spike) makes it the ideal GHRP partner for long-term protocols.

Ipamorelin: 200–300 mcg SQ · pre-sleep
Tesamorelin: 2 mg SQ · same injection · pre-sleep
Primary benefit: Maximal GH pulsatility, fat loss, recovery, sleep depth

Raun 1998 Bowers 2002

+ CJC-1295 (no DAC)

Strong

View CJC-1295 (no DAC) →

CJC-1295 (no DAC) is a short-acting GHRH analogue. Combined with ipamorelin (GHRP), the pulse is amplified across both receptor systems with timing similar to native physiology. Without the DAC modification, the stack maintains sharp peaks rather than the sustained elevation seen with CJC-1295-DAC + ipamorelin.

Ipamorelin: 200–300 mcg SQ · pre-sleep
CJC-1295 (no DAC): 100 mcg SQ · same injection
Primary benefit: Pulsatile GH stimulation matching physiological pattern

Teichman 2006 Ionescu 2006