Side-by-side · Research reference

Follistatin-344vsVilon

Side-by-side comparison across mechanism, dosage, evidence, side effects, administration, and stack synergies. Citations on every claim where available.

AHuman-MechanisticHUMAN-REVIEWED4/58 cited

BAnimal-StrongHUMAN-REVIEWED13/49 cited

Follistatin-344

Myostatin/Activin Antagonist · Research Use

15–25%FST/MSTN ratio ↑

344 AACirculating isoform

ResearchPhase status

Research · No approved protocol

Vilon

Khavinson Bioregulator · Dipeptide

2 AADipeptide

T-helperStimulatesLinkova 2011

MouseModel basisKhavinson 2002

Literature lacks standardised clinical route

01Mechanism of Action

Parameter

Follistatin-344

Vilon

Primary target

Myostatin (MSTN/GDF-8) and Activin A

Immune cell differentiation pathways, chromatin modification

Pathway

FST-344 binds MSTN/Activin → prevents ActRIIB receptor engagement → disinhibits muscle anabolism

Vilon → Thymocyte sphingomyelinase activation → T-helper & cytotoxic T-cell differentiation; epigenetic suppression of aging markers (CCL11, HMGB1)

Downstream effect

Elevated follistatin/myostatin ratio, increased muscle protein synthesis, attenuated muscle atrophy signalingJeong 2026

Enhanced T-cell differentiation (CD4+, CD8+, B-cells), thymocyte proliferation, modulated IL-1β comitogenic activity, proposed chromatin decondensation in aged lymphocytesLinkova 2011 Khavinson 2002 Lezhava 2023

Feedback intact?

Yes — indirect antagonist, preserves endogenous regulation

Unknown — no HPA/HPG axis data

Origin

Endogenous glycoprotein, 344-AA isoform lacking heparin-binding domain (vs FST-315)

Synthetic dipeptide derived from Khavinson thymic peptide extraction studies (Thymalin fraction)Morozov 1997

Antibody development

Not documented in available trials (endogenous protein)

—

02Dosage Protocols

Parameter

Follistatin-344

Vilon

Clinical protocol

None — no approved dosing regimen

Follistatin-344 measured as endogenous biomarker, not administered exogenously in cited trials.

—

Research context

Endogenous modulation via exercise + nutrition

Resistance training + EAA intake elevated FST/MSTN ratio by 15–25% in 12-week RCT (older women).

—

Evidence basis

Human observational / biomarker studies

Mouse / in vitro only

Half-life

Not established

Circulating isoform; lacks tissue-binding domain of FST-315.

Not published — dipeptides typically <10 min plasma t½

Standard dose

—

No clinical standard — literature lacks human dosing

Russian practice: often combined with other Khavinson peptides; no FDA/EMA trials.

Animal model dose

—

In vitro: 0.01–10 μg/mL culture medium (mouse thymocytes)

Not translatable to human mg/kg without pharmacokinetic data.

Frequency

—

Unknown — literature does not specify chronic administration protocols

Duration

—

Not characterised in humans

Route

—

Likely SQ or oral (Khavinson school uses both); no published ROA validation

03Metabolic / Fat Loss Evidence

Parameter

Follistatin-344

Vilon

Primary target

Muscle mass preservation, not direct lipolysis

—

Indirect fat effect

Increased lean mass → elevated resting metabolic rate

Not primary mechanism. Muscle-sparing during deficit.

—

Clinical evidence

Lorcaserin trial (6 mo) showed no MAFI axis changes during fat lossRamirez-Cisneros 2026

Suggests follistatin not primary driver of fat loss in weight-reduction interventions.

—

GLP-1RA studies

Liraglutide (35 days) — no significant MAFI axis modulation despite fat/lean changes

—

04Side Effects & Safety

Parameter

Follistatin-344

Vilon

Clinical safety data

None — no human exogenous administration trials in literature

—

Theoretical risks

Excessive myostatin inhibition → muscle overgrowth, impaired glucose tolerance

Based on myostatin-null animal models and clinical myostatin inhibitor trials.

—

Endogenous elevation (exercise)

No adverse effects reported in 12-week resistance + EAA trials

—

Cancer risk (theoretical)

Myostatin inhibition may promote tumor growth in malignancy (preclinical data)

—

Regulatory status

Not approved for human use — research peptide only

—

Human safety data

—

Absent from PubMed-indexed literature

Theoretical risk

—

Immune hyperactivation in autoimmune-prone individuals (T-cell differentiation enhancement)

Antibody formation

—

Not reported; dipeptides generally low immunogenicity

Animal models

—

No adverse effects noted in mouse thymocyte or pineal lymphoid cultures

Absolute Contraindications

Follistatin-344

·Active malignancy
·No approved protocol — research use only

Vilon

·Active autoimmune disease (theoretical — no clinical data)

Relative Contraindications

Follistatin-344

·Insulin resistance / Type 2 diabetes (monitor glucose)
·Pregnancy / lactation (unknown safety profile)

Vilon

·Pregnancy / lactation (no safety data)
·Acute infection with cytokine storm risk (immune modulation unknown)

05Administration Protocol

Parameter

Follistatin-344

Vilon

1. Regulatory status

Follistatin-344 is not approved for human administration. All cited studies measure endogenous serum follistatin as a biomarker, not as an exogenous therapeutic agent.

No clinical protocols exist in Western peer-reviewed literature. Russian gerontological practice may use 1–10 mg ranges, but dosing is empirical.

2. Endogenous modulation

Resistance exercise combined with essential amino acid (EAA) supplementation elevated the follistatin/myostatin ratio by 15–25% in 12-week randomized trials. Protein intake (1.2–1.5 g/kg/day) synergizes with training to upregulate endogenous follistatin.

Subcutaneous injection (common for Khavinson peptides) or oral (some bioregulators reportedly active orally due to small size). No validated ROA.

3. Measurement context

Serum follistatin and follistatin/myostatin ratio are used diagnostically in sarcopenia screening and as biomarkers of muscle anabolic balance in clinical trials.

Unknown — no circadian or meal-timing data. Khavinson school often recommends morning administration.

4. Research consideration

Gene therapy and recombinant follistatin delivery are under preclinical investigation for muscular dystrophy and sarcopenia. No human safety or efficacy data for exogenous FST-344 administration.

Likely lyophilised powder, refrigerated. Reconstitution protocols not published.

06Stack Synergy

Follistatin-344

+ BPC-157

Multi-pathway

View BPC-157 →

Follistatin-344 (myostatin antagonist) and BPC-157 (tissue repair peptide) address complementary pathways in muscle recovery. FST-344 promotes muscle protein synthesis by disinhibiting myostatin signaling, while BPC-157 accelerates healing of tendons, ligaments, and microtears via angiogenesis and collagen synthesis. Combined, they may support both hypertrophy and structural repair during high-volume training or injury recovery.

Follistatin-344: No approved protocol — endogenous modulation via resistance exercise + EAA
BPC-157: 250–500 mcg SQ · twice daily · near injury site or systemic
Duration: 4–8 weeks
Primary benefit: Muscle hypertrophy + accelerated soft tissue repair

+ TB-500

Moderate

View TB-500 →

TB-500 (thymosin beta-4 fragment) promotes cell migration, angiogenesis, and anti-inflammatory signaling in muscle and connective tissue. Follistatin-344's anabolic signaling may synergize with TB-500's regenerative effects during muscle damage or overtraining, particularly in older adults where both myostatin inhibition and tissue repair are rate-limiting.

Follistatin-344: Endogenous upregulation (resistance training + protein)
TB-500: 2–5 mg SQ · twice weekly · loading phase 4 weeks, then maintenance
Frequency: Twice weekly TB-500, daily training stimulus for FST
Primary benefit: Enhanced recovery, reduced inflammation, muscle growth support

Vilon

+ Epitalon

Moderate

View Epitalon →

Both are Khavinson bioregulators targeting aging pathways. Epitalon (Ala-Glu-Asp-Gly) acts on telomerase and pineal function; Vilon on immune differentiation and chromatin decondensation. Combined in Russian gerontological protocols for multi-system aging intervention. Lezhava et al. (2023) tested both on aged lymphocyte chromatin, showing distinct epigenetic effects. Complementary, not synergistic in strict pharmacological sense.

Vilon: Empirical — no standard
Epitalon: Empirical — often 10 mg cycles
Frequency: Sequential or concurrent (literature ambiguous)
Primary benefit: Multi-system aging modulation (immune + pineal/circadian)

+ Thymalin

Weak

View Thymalin →

Thymalin is the parent polypeptide complex from which Vilon was isolated. Both target immune differentiation, but Thymalin is a complex mixture (multiple peptides), whereas Vilon is a purified dipeptide. Morozov & Khavinson (1997) described Vilon as a synthetic successor designed to replicate Thymalin's immunomodulatory effects with greater specificity. Redundant in practice; no published combination studies.

Vilon: No standard
Thymalin: 10–100 mg IM (polypeptide complex)
Primary benefit: Redundant — both target T-cell differentiation

Morozov 1997 Khavinson 2020