Skip to content
Specimen Atlas of Research Peptides81 plates · MIT
Side-by-side · Research reference

HexarelinvsVilon

Side-by-side comparison across mechanism, dosage, evidence, side effects, administration, and stack synergies. Citations on every claim where available.

APhase 1HUMAN-REVIEWED19/45 cited
BAnimal-StrongHUMAN-REVIEWED13/49 cited
Hexarelin
Hexapeptide GHRP · Cardio-tropic
100–200 mcgPer doseSmith 1996
Phase 1Evidence levelGhigo 1997
~70 minHalf-lifeSemenistaya 2010
SQ · Multiple sites · 1–3×/day
Vilon
Khavinson Bioregulator · Dipeptide
2 AADipeptide
T-helperStimulatesLinkova 2011
MouseModel basisKhavinson 2002
Literature lacks standardised clinical route

01Mechanism of Action

Parameter
Hexarelin
Vilon
Primary target
Ghrelin receptor (GHS-R1a) + cardiac CD36Smith 1996Ghigo 1997
Immune cell differentiation pathways, chromatin modification
Pathway
GHS-R1a → Gαq → Ca²⁺ → GH release. CD36 engagement → direct cardio-tropic actionGhigo 1997
Vilon → Thymocyte sphingomyelinase activation → T-helper & cytotoxic T-cell differentiation; epigenetic suppression of aging markers (CCL11, HMGB1)
Downstream effect
Strong GH pulse + IGF-1 elevation; cardio-protective effects in animal MI modelsGhigo 1997
Enhanced T-cell differentiation (CD4+, CD8+, B-cells), thymocyte proliferation, modulated IL-1β comitogenic activity, proposed chromatin decondensation in aged lymphocytesLinkova 2011Khavinson 2002Lezhava 2023
Feedback intact?
Yes initially; tachyphylaxis with chronic useGhigo 1997
Unknown — no HPA/HPG axis data
Origin
Synthetic hexapeptide His-D-2-Methyl-Trp-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH₂Smith 1996
Synthetic dipeptide derived from Khavinson thymic peptide extraction studies (Thymalin fraction)Morozov 1997
Antibody development

02Dosage Protocols

Parameter
Hexarelin
Vilon
Standard dose
100–200 mcg per injectionSmith 1996
No clinical standard — literature lacks human dosing
Russian practice: often combined with other Khavinson peptides; no FDA/EMA trials.
Frequency
1–2× per day max (tachyphylaxis with chronic 3× daily)
Unknown — literature does not specify chronic administration protocols
Lower / starter dose
50 mcg per dose
Evidence basis
Phase 1 / Phase 2 trialsSmith 1996Ghigo 1997
Mouse / in vitro only
Duration
4–8 weeks on / 4–8 weeks off (tachyphylaxis mitigation)
Not characterised in humans
Reconstitution
Bacteriostatic water
Timing
Pre-sleep + fasted preferred
Half-life
Not published — dipeptides typically <10 min plasma t½
Animal model dose
In vitro: 0.01–10 μg/mL culture medium (mouse thymocytes)
Not translatable to human mg/kg without pharmacokinetic data.
Route
Likely SQ or oral (Khavinson school uses both); no published ROA validation

04Side Effects & Safety

Parameter
Hexarelin
Vilon
Cortisol elevation
Modest at high dosesGhigo 1997
Prolactin elevation
Modest at high dosesGhigo 1997
Hunger
Strong appetite increase via ghrelin agonism
Tachyphylaxis
Receptor desensitisation with chronic dosingGhigo 1997
Cardiac effects
Direct cardio-tropic; potential benefit in MI but unstudied in humansGhigo 1997
IGF-1 elevation
Strong; monitor with chronic high-dose use
Cancer risk
Contraindicated in active malignancy (GH/IGF-1 axis)
Pregnancy / OB
Avoid
Human safety data
Absent from PubMed-indexed literature
Theoretical risk
Immune hyperactivation in autoimmune-prone individuals (T-cell differentiation enhancement)
Antibody formation
Not reported; dipeptides generally low immunogenicity
Animal models
No adverse effects noted in mouse thymocyte or pineal lymphoid cultures
Absolute Contraindications
Hexarelin
  • ·Active malignancy
  • ·Pregnancy / breastfeeding
  • ·Disrupted hypothalamic-pituitary axis
Vilon
  • ·Active autoimmune disease (theoretical — no clinical data)
Relative Contraindications
Hexarelin
  • ·Untreated diabetes
  • ·Severe hyperprolactinemia
Vilon
  • ·Pregnancy / lactation (no safety data)
  • ·Acute infection with cytokine storm risk (immune modulation unknown)

05Administration Protocol

Parameter
Hexarelin
Vilon
1. Reconstitution
Add 2 mL bacteriostatic water to 5 mg vial → 2.5 mg/mL = 250 mcg per 0.1 mL.
No clinical protocols exist in Western peer-reviewed literature. Russian gerontological practice may use 1–10 mg ranges, but dosing is empirical.
2. Injection site
SQ — abdomen or thigh. Rotate sites.
Subcutaneous injection (common for Khavinson peptides) or oral (some bioregulators reportedly active orally due to small size). No validated ROA.
3. Timing
Pre-sleep + fasted preferred. Cycle on/off to avoid tachyphylaxis.
Unknown — no circadian or meal-timing data. Khavinson school often recommends morning administration.
4. Storage
Lyophilised: room temp, light-protected. Reconstituted: refrigerate ≤30 days.
Likely lyophilised powder, refrigerated. Reconstitution protocols not published.
5. Needle
29–31G, 4–8 mm insulin syringe.

06Stack Synergy

Hexarelin
+ CJC-1295 (no DAC)
Strong
View CJC-1295 (no DAC)

Hexarelin (GHRP) + CJC-1295-no-DAC (GHRH analogue) is the higher-amplitude variant of the standard GHRH+GHRP stack. Hexarelin produces a stronger pulse than ipamorelin but with cortisol + prolactin signal — choose this stack for maximum GH amplitude when side-effect tolerance is acceptable. Cycle aggressively.

Hexarelin
100 mcg SQ · pre-sleep
CJC-1295 (no DAC)
100 mcg SQ · same injection
Primary benefit
Maximum GH pulse amplitude (with side-effect signal)
Vilon
+ Epitalon
Moderate
View Epitalon

Both are Khavinson bioregulators targeting aging pathways. Epitalon (Ala-Glu-Asp-Gly) acts on telomerase and pineal function; Vilon on immune differentiation and chromatin decondensation. Combined in Russian gerontological protocols for multi-system aging intervention. Lezhava et al. (2023) tested both on aged lymphocyte chromatin, showing distinct epigenetic effects. Complementary, not synergistic in strict pharmacological sense.

Vilon
Empirical — no standard
Epitalon
Empirical — often 10 mg cycles
Frequency
Sequential or concurrent (literature ambiguous)
Primary benefit
Multi-system aging modulation (immune + pineal/circadian)
+ Thymalin
Weak
View Thymalin

Thymalin is the parent polypeptide complex from which Vilon was isolated. Both target immune differentiation, but Thymalin is a complex mixture (multiple peptides), whereas Vilon is a purified dipeptide. Morozov & Khavinson (1997) described Vilon as a synthetic successor designed to replicate Thymalin's immunomodulatory effects with greater specificity. Redundant in practice; no published combination studies.

Vilon
No standard
Thymalin
10–100 mg IM (polypeptide complex)
Primary benefit
Redundant — both target T-cell differentiation