SS-31vsVesugen
Side-by-side comparison across mechanism, dosage, evidence, side effects, administration, and stack synergies. Citations on every claim where available.
01Mechanism of Action
02Dosage Protocols
04Side Effects & Safety
- ·Pregnancy / breastfeeding
- ·Hypersensitivity to peptide
- ·None established
- ·Active malignancy — proliferative mechanism (Ki-67 upregulation) untested in oncologic context
05Administration Protocol
06Stack Synergy
SS-31 and MOTS-c address mitochondrial decline through complementary axes. SS-31 protects existing mitochondrial structure (cardiolipin binding, cristae stabilisation). MOTS-c upregulates AMPK/PGC-1α, triggering biogenesis of new mitochondria. Together they pair preservation with renewal — anecdotally favoured in healthspan and post-cardio-event recovery protocols.
- SS-31
- 5–10 mg SQ · daily morning
- MOTS-c
- 5 mg SQ · 2× per week pre-workout
- Primary benefit
- Mitochondrial preservation + biogenesis
Both from Khavinson bioregulatory school. Thymalin targets thymic/immune axis, Vesugen targets vascular endothelium. Rationale: multi-system geroprotection in elderly — immune senescence + vascular aging. Documented in Khavinson-tradition protocols combining tissue-specific peptides for poly-organ rejuvenation. No direct synergy study; combinatorial logic based on distinct target tissues.
- Vesugen
- Per protocol (SQ/IM)
- Thymalin
- Per protocol (SQ/IM)
- Frequency
- Sequential or concurrent per geroprotective protocol
- Primary benefit
- Multi-system age-related decline mitigation (vascular + immune)